Livrer - to Deliver - French Verb Conjugations

Earth s Impact On Earth - 1201 Words

Humans have changed the face of Earth from the moment they first arrived. We humans who rule the earth and live in the earth have changed in many ways; ever since we came we have had growth in population, impact has been greater. We cut down forests, emitting pollutants, spilling oil, burying toxic waste, dumping garbage in oceans. We have affected this earth in a very positive and a negative way ever since we arrived on this planet called earth. Let me take you on a journey of how humans have transformed over time. Before humans arrived on earth was a molten rock which took hundreds of years to cool down and then it rained for years which formed oceans and finally life started to form on earth. Earth began 4.6 billion years ago from the same cloud of gas (mostly hydrogen and helium) and interstellar dust that formed our sun. First organisms around 3.6 billion years ago were simple cells oxygen producing bacteria. Also many things happened during geological process such as crystallizing of molten rock and wearing a way of landmasses. Humans started arriving later and everything started to change. Humans arrived on earth 200,000 thousand years ago, time of climate change, modern humans (Homo sapiens) evolved in Africa. Like early humans, modern humans gathered and hunted food. They developed behaviors that helped them react to the challenges of survival. Around 40,000 years ago Humans become more modernized and they start moving out of Africa and towards Europe and Hunt andShow MoreRelatedEarth s Impact On Earth1834 Words   |  8 Pages Earth History Paper Earth has been around for billions of years, about 4.543 billion years to be more exact. Through the years, it is safe to say that Earth has changed significantly. The planet Earth formed billions of years ago from next to nothing, the Earth’s plates have moved to change the surface appearance and structure, life on Earth has evolved drastically, and Earth developed an essential atmosphere as well as oceans. As the Earth continues to change, humans continue to learn more aboutRead MoreThe Earth s Oceans And Its Impact On Earth1269 Words   |  6 Pages1). While these are just facts that tell the worst-case scenario, they should be alarms that spark change in the way we fish. This paper, however, will specifically target overfishing in the Grand Banks in Newfoundland, Canada, and analyze its impact on Earth, its Environment and Humanity. Over fishing is simply when fishermen catch more fish than are being reproduced. Eventually the stock of fish in the environment will be comp letely depleted. That is exactly what happened off the shores of NewfoundlandRead MoreThe And Their Impact On Earth s Climate1435 Words   |  6 PagesSunspots and Their Impact on Earth s Climate The sun is an incredibly dynamic ball of mass and energy at the center of our solar system. The source of the sun s energy is nuclear fusion; where mass is converted into energy when protons (positively charged hydrogen atoms) smash together at incredible speeds at the center of the sun to form helium. Nuclear forces aren t the only thing acting on the sun, electromagnetic forces also play a vital role in the sun s dynamic behavior. Due to the unimaginablyRead MoreThe Impact Of Volcanic Eruptions On The Earth s Climate System Essay1391 Words   |  6 PagesWhen examining the influence and impacts of volcanic eruptions upon the earth’s climate system we have to consider occurrences both in the present and in the past. It has been noted by McGuire et al. that â€Å"Volcanic activity and environmental change have been linked during recent times and in the geological record.† (2002:88) With thousands of volcanic events having transpired since the Archean, there is an abun dance of evidence to support the theory that volcanoes have impacted our climate for overRead MoreThe Impact Of Space Travel On Our Earth s Climate Essay1430 Words   |  6 Pagesthe entire population, and it makes so much more sense to stop screwing up the planet we’re already on instead of trying to find a new one. In the past 200 years we’ve made a greater impact on our earth’s climate than we have in the preceding 200,000 years of our existence1, and it definitely hasn’t been a positive impact. Our climate cycles on its own over long periods of time, but this latest cycle has changed at a much more significant rate than any of the previous theorized cycles. We’ve had technologicalRead MoreThe World s Terrifying Impact On Earth Justifies New Anthropocene Epoch1752 Words   |  8 Pagesâ€Å"Humanity’s terrifying impact on Earth justifies new Anthropocene epoch† is the title of an article published in the Guardian newspaper in October 2014, the purpose of this essay is to assess if this statement was and is true. The geologic timescale comprises of Eons, Eras, Periods, Epochs and Ages, all of which fit into each other with Eon being the largest. Key geological events in the life of the planet are used to mark the transition from one of these chapters to another. Fig 1 has been createdRead MoreImpact Of Drilling On The Earth s Oceans And The Well Being Of Wildlife And Humans850 Words   |  4 Pagesthe NPR, unleashed the worst environmental catastrophe our nation has ever seen, and its impacts are still lingering today. II. Thesis: I wish to share this information with you all today because it is up to us to end offshore drilling. If we all became more knowledgeable on the ramifications of offshore drilling, we could better know how to avoid it. I firstly want to address the significant environmental impacts of drilling, second the alternative we can employ instead of drilling, and lastly howRead MoreHow Choices I Have Made That Impact The Earth s Water Cycle874 Words   |  4 PagesThe Water Cycle This essay examines choices I have made that impact the earth’s water cycle. I have focused primarily on water conservation and acknowledged my greenhouse gas contributions. I have a new appreciation for the hydrologic cycle. I had not previously thought about the world’s water supply in terms of 1.39B cubic kilometers or that only one percent of this is available as fresh water for humanity to work with (not accounting for the polar icecaps, glaciers or ocean desalination efforts)Read MoreThe Moon Is The Only Natural Satellite Of Earth1436 Words   |  6 Pagessatellite of Earth. Its orbit is 384,400 km from Earth, the diameter is 3476 km and the mass is 7.35e22 kg. The moon is also Called Luna by the Romans, Selene and Artemis by the Greeks, and many other names in other mythologies. The Moon, of course, has been known since prehistoric times. It is the second brightest object in the sky after the Sun. As the Moon orbits around the Earth once per month, the angle between the Earth, the Moon and the Sun changes; we see this as the cycle of the Moon s phasesRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1267 Words   |  6 Pagesthreatening issue that scientists and the government have been cognizant about. Global warming is the term used to describe a gradual increase in the average temperature of the Earth s atmosphere and its oceans, a change that is believed to be permanently changing the Earth’s climate. The earth periodically warms up and cools down. The Earth is currently going through a warming trend that coincides with the industrial revolution. This threat has cause several negative influx in our world. For instance, higher

The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts Free Essays

string(40) " radical shifts from the Neoclassicism\." Artistes have always painted scenes of war from the Ancient worlds of Egypt and Greece. The relief inside the Abu Simbel Temple showing Ramses in the Battle of Kadesh and of his victory over the Hittites is an excellent example. The Athena Frieze depicting the battle of Greeks against the Persians, which are some of the earliest example of a specific historical event being, sculptured (Greek Art). We will write a custom essay sample on The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts or any similar topic only for you Order Now To the photographs that are coming from the current war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the flagged draped coffins of the dead in the cargo hull on their way home. In the periods of art, before Goya’s the Third of May tended to glorify war and make it seem romantic and heroic without the effects of the bloodshed and horrors that war brings. Benjamin West’s The Death of General Wolfe does show the effect of war, however, he has made a martyr of General Wolfe surrounded by his officers making this painting seems to be Romanizing the death (Class Lecture-The Neoclassical 2 of 3). Benjamin West was an American Neoclassical painter who turned art historical order upside down by not depicting a classical theme and used clothing of the time (Gehmacaher). The Neoclassical period of art was a reaction to the Baroque and Rococo style of art where a renewed interest for classical antiquity of the ancient Greek and Roman seeking the geometric harmony of the time (Kleiner 330). The Neoclassical period of art was during the Enlightenment period where critical thinking of the world and humankind spurred the great political, social and economic changes resulted in Revolutions in France and America (Kleiner 319). Writers such as Rousseau, Voltaire, and Jefferson help the change the critical thinking in political, social and economic toward humankind and what was going on in the world helped inspired the French and American Revolutions (Class Lecture-The Neoclassical 1 of 3). This influenced the people to put a new light on all thinking and question the traditional ideas and ways of doing things whether it was in painting, sculpture, writing, science, politics, and nature (Smart History). The Death of General Wolfe is the final stages of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, which takes place in Quebec, Canada, when the French and British fought during the Seven Year’s War for control of Canada or as it was called then New France (Gehmacher). General Wolfe, a British officer, won the battle but lost his life in this campaign on September 13, 1759, the French surrendered Quebec five days later and by 1760 surrendered in Montreal after a failed attempt to regain control of the capital (BBC). West has distorted the events surrounding General Wolfe death to heighten the drama in this painting (Gehmacher). West does not depict General Wolfe in armor like that of ancient soldiers but he has paid close attention to the details of the uniforms and the clothes of the Indians (Stacey). To me, West has made a martyr of General Wolfe by having him surrounded by his officers and Indians with the front lines not far off. This also glorifies and romanizes war, everyone around the dying General seem unaffected by the battle that is raging nearby. Jacques-Louis David preferred the ancient and Renaissance works, and agreed with the Enlightenment philosophy that the subject matter should have a moral balance reflect the artwork of ancient times and depicting noble events in history would civil virtues and patriotism (Kleiner 332) inspire. David’s Oath of the Horatii is an excellent example of the Enlightenment philosophy and of Neoclassical style. David became the painter of French Revolution and was on the board that voted to behead the King; he also became the official painter for Napoleon (Zucker). Oath of the Horatii is keeping with the neoclassical style, by the David has used colors and by classicizing contemporary subject matter (Gersh-Nesic). David has used diagonal movements with heroic poses of the father and sons, and grouping the women behind the focus of the painting to give this painting the classic feel, that it has (The Neoclassical 3 of 3). Oath of the Horatii is about three brothers swearing on oath on their swords with their father gives them, the sons swear to fight to the death for their country (Zucker). David has a group of women that seem in despair over the oath of the brothers, he has also bathed the women in light to show their despair. David has used the dark archways to give depth to this painting and light on the swords and arms of the brothers to show their bond with their father. The one thing I have noticed about David style of painting is that has fluidness about his work and there are no brush strokes visible. David’s male figures appear statuesque and virile like the ancient Greek and Roman soldiers; he has also used soft colors to make this painting more alluring and dramatic. This painting like that of West seems to glorify the act of war. These painting are done in the Neoclassical style but they both have a different feel to them. West’s has the act of dying on the battlefield and has used the clothing of the times and no reference to the past. David on the other hand has depicted an ancient Roman scene. To me this is the last art period that depicts war as heroic and glorifies it. The Romantics were about getting back to nature and the common people to evoke individualism, subjectivism, imagination and emotions (Romanticism). The Romantics were the first group of artists to turn away from the academic style of the Neoclassical, this movement started in the late 18th century and early 19th century because of the Napoleonic wars (Romanticism). The transition from Neoclassicism was a shift from reason to feeling and uses the social and political climate to draw their inspiration (Kleiner 340). Goya, a Spanish Romantic artist, Third of May is an example of the radical shifts from the Neoclassicism. You read "The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts" in category "Papers" Here Goya has used light and dark to emphasis the scene that is unfolding before us. The Spanish King, Charles IV, asked Napoleon to help Spain defend them against Great Britain, Napoleon saw this as a weakness and took control of Spain by putting his brother in control of Spain (Zucker). The Spanish who first liked the idea of the French getting rid of the British, the Spanish people soon realized the French as invaders and on the 2nd of May, the Spanish attacked Napoleon’s men in a violent clash (Kleiner 341). Napoleon’s men then responded by executing several Spanish citizens, Goya is painting that massacre. The Third of May is the result and Goya has done an excellent job here is showing the senseless act by the French soldiers. Goya has used the light on the man in the front with his arms outreached about to be executed to draw your attention to the brutal act of the soldiers and to evoke empathy to common man. Goya has the French soldiers back to the viewer so they cannot see their face to show the injustice unfolding. He has used the mountain or hill in the background to show the people as trapped and no way to get away from the soldiers and dead bodies around to show how helpless these people are (Zucker). Goya has used several things to draw attention to what is going on in this painting, the rifles pointing at the man in the white shirt on his knees, the blood in on the ground in front of him, the lantern to shed light on the man about to be shot and his face that shows no fear. All of this helps show the ruthlessness of the French soldiers. He has also used earth tones in this painting with strong brushstrokes and used shadows that show the Romantic styles break from the Neoclassical style. While I find this painting, somewhat disturbing Goya has used his coloring, shadowing, and lines to draw to viewer into this painting and feel the helplessness of the Spanish people and Goya has made a martyr of the man about to be shot. Realism was a moment the developed out of the Industrial Revolution when artist in France rejected the fantastic and focused on the reality of the world and painted the everyday life (Photography and Realism 4 of 6). Painters like Gustave Courbet and Jean-Francois Millet painted wonderful scenes of the everyday peasant life in The Stone Breakers and The Gleaners but it was during this time that photography came into the world and could capture life and preserve that moment forever. Timothy O’Sullivan’s photography A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania shows the true horrors of war; this was taken after one of the worst battles during the American Civil War. The Civil War was due to the Industrial Revolution effects of the northern states becoming more industrial than the south that was still an agricultural society that was using slaves for the work. In this photograph, there is a fog over the battlefield in the distance you can see men on horses, as you look closer at the dead soldiers you can see that the Confederate soldiers’ shoes have been removed. The shoes of the dead were removed for use of surviving soldiers who needed them and it did not stop at the shoes for once again the Confederate soldiers’ pockets have been gone through for their pockets appear turned out (Cornell University). This photography shows the true reality of the horrors of war in the awful details this photography has taken. Photographs of other wars also show the horrible reality of war, and the power of the picture speaks for the horrors of war. The photos of the oncentrations camps after World War II are excellent examples of man’s inhumanity to man, and I will not describe any of these here because to are too horrific to look at. The photograph of the flag being raised on Iwo Jima shows six men raising an American flag after a battle for the island. This picture is showing a simple act of raising the flag to show their support for their country. While this photo does not show the horrors of war, it shows that despite the battle that fough t and the loss of life there can be a simple act that defines us. Then there is the photograph of the aftermath of a napalm attack in Vietnam taken by Nick Ut, here you see Vietnamese children running through the streets screaming and one little girl has no clothes on, soldiers are behind the children and in the background you can see the smoke of the bombs. Photographer Ut said that he had seen two airplanes and each one dropped four bombs and minutes later he saw the people running away and the little girl that appears to be the focus of the image yelling for water because she was to hot (BBC News). The terrified face of the children screaming speaks volumes in this photo and shows how war affects everyone not just the soldiers fighting the battles. Photographs show the reality of war in unflinching view, while painters interrupt what they see. The German Expressionists did just that after World War I. German Expressionists used disorganized outlines and angry brushstrokes to connive their message in their works and to illustrate the injustice of society that was growing during this time of global uncertainty (German Expressionism). There were several movements in the German Expressionist; the first was called Der Brucke (The Bridge), Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) and Neue Sachlickeit (New Objectivity). Franz Marc was one of the founders of the Der Blaue Reiter, which got its name from Marc and Vassily Kandinsky’s interest in horses and the color blue (Kleiner 386). However, Marc did not paint Fate of the Animals during World War I, but while serving during the war he wrote a letter to his wife that â€Å"is like a premonition of this war—horrible and shattering. I can hardly conceive that I painted it† (Kleiner 388). Here Marc is showing us a forest that is being destroyed uses vivid colors and jagged forms to connive his message (Labedzki). I have used this painting because I think had Marc lived through World War I, he would have painted another form of this to show the horrors he saw during that time. He said to his wife that this was a premonition; I can only image what he would have painted after the war. Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix, known for his work under the name Otto Dix, was a German Expressionists in the Neue Sachlichkeit (New Objectivity). This movement formed after World War I by artist that severed in the German army and their experiences military influenced their art (Kleiner 400). Otto Dix’s aim was to show the world those experiences with wrenching, ruthless and harsh depictions of the war as depicted in his Shock Troops Advance under Gas and The Trench (Henshaw). The Trench is filled dead bodies at different stages of decomposition did cause a public outcry that the museum director show the painting was forced to resign (WWI, Otto Dix). Dix said of his work â€Å"that life is not colorful at all. It is much darker, quieter in its tonality, much simpler. I wanted to depict things as they really are† (Heller). Dix depicted the war as it actually was and drew great criticism for his works with the war as the subject. Dix’s medium for Shock Troops Advance under Gas was an etching, portraying the soldiers need to wear gas masks due to the invention of mustard gas used in World War I. Once again showing man’s inhumanity to man. This reminds me of Munch’s Scream. How to cite The Glorification and Horrors of War Through the Arts, Essays

Deterrence and Criminal Justice Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Deterrence and Criminal Justice. Answer: Introduction Deterrence is one of the central concepts in the subject of criminal justice globally. In simple words Deterrence means discouraging or condemning criminal activities by threatening the person committing the crime to be received serious ramifications. Deterrence is one of the long standing concepts which have acted as the mainstay for practicing criminal justice. Deterrence as a concept has been there in use from the ancient times when the roman kings used to punish people for wrongdoings against the state. In this way deterrence has becomes such a strong aspect for criminal justice across the world. Deterrence came into being with greater importance as in the earlier days of king most of the people feared being received with major punishment that prevented them from committing any kind of crime. Most of the opponents of the capital punishment have opposed strongly against deterrence stating that it doesnt have major impact on the person and hence it could be said that capital punish ment doesnt have any positive impact on crime. In the contemporary world it is stated that punishment is the not the best of ways to eliminate crime or prevent people to commit crime and hence show deterrence doesnt work anymore (Braga and Weisburd, 2012). In the present argumentative essay there are two different ideas of deterrence namely theory of punishment and impulsivity. The essay will discuss these two concepts which would help to compare and contrast deterrence and state why deterrence doesnt work anymore. Comparison between two different deterrence ideas Over the years the federal systems have largely dependent on punishment in order to focus on deterring the range of crime to a large extent. Over the years there are number of people in different countries who are incarcerated for crimes but the rate of crime doesnt seem to end. The sentencing systems have been largely used to focus on improving the offenders but it has been seen that deterrence cannot work in the contemporary world. While the criminal justice system as a whole makes a deterrent effect but it is important to understand that most of the criminal justice systems focus on applying the punishment but it could be said that opposing scholars state that punishment doesnt work anymore. In broad view punishment could be expected to affect deterrence in one or two ways (Willison and Warkentin, 2013). In Australia it could be seen that the crime rate has not reduced even after the application of punishment that is the maximum rate of punishment the rate of crime has not reduced . The standard counter agreement against punishment is that one could execute innocent person and hence it is important to assess that deterrence may not work. With punishment it cannot be said that criminal activities have reduced dramatically but with liberal criminal justice policies deterrence have been strongly denied. Capital punishment in different countries is different but in most of the situations it could be said that capital punishment doesnt affect the mindset of the criminals to a large extent. Rationality is one of the main concepts in the deterrence and it has to be understood that the two different concepts of deterrence namely theory of punishment and impulsivity (Jackson et al., 2012). The deterrence theory mainly states that people obey law because they are afraid of punishment and hence tend to obey law. The deterrence theory mainly states that people do not commit crime because they are afraid of law but because of being motivated to by moral sense. Hence in this case it could be said that a person is motivated and dissuaded from committing a crime if the punishment is swift, certain and severe. While deterrence is focused on preventing wrong doers from committing crimes on the other hand it is effective to set examples for the others to deter against crime. Basically deterrence is based on different ideas but the theory of punishment is one of the common ideas that work in deterrence (Kleck and Barnes, 2013). Punishment is one of the oldest methods that are used to deter offenders and other people. It has been stated by the researchers that the end of crime is punishment. As discussed deterrence is largely related to punishment as punishment is given in order to deter commoners from committing crimes but in the contemporary world it cannot be said that punishment doesnt really act effectively to prevent people from committing crimes and hence punishment is not supported by many research scholars. It is also stated that for behavior modifications punishment is not anymore a suitable option rather reward system have been supported by the scholars to a large extent (Nagin, 2013). Since the yester years crime has been seen as evil and was considered performed under a spell by evil spirit and hence he or she was punished and since people in the earlier years were afraid of punishments and so they did not commit crimes initially. As per the statistics the crime rate in Australia did not get red uced even after strong and maximum punishment given by the court of Law. As per the information way back in the 1967 the murder rate in Australia was around 150 increasing over a period of time by 200 where there were 96 executions done but there were no changes in the murder rates over the years which clearly shows that punishment doesnt make a huge difference in the minds of the criminal (Cronin-Furman, 2013). Impulsivity is another idea on which deterrence works especially when its stated that deterrence is largely based on rationality. It is important to note that in crime it is stated that most of the people have that decision making ability which drives them to either commit a crime or not committing it. Impulsivity is an extremely important aspect in the study of deterrence and hence it is important that this aspect is studied properly. The general theory of crime clearly states that committing a crime basically depends on the self control and the ability to make decisions and this is where most of the potential criminals might deter from committing crimes but on the other hand it could be said that most of the criminals with long criminal background are not moved by impulses as hence commit crimes (Saridakis and Spengler, 2012). It is considered that they are not impulsive and since make their decisions extremely effectively and hence doesnt become impulsive. Describing criminality i n terms of self control is very tough and hence impulsivity cannot focus on deterrence as with longer criminal record. For instance when a person is doing robbery for money there mightnt be impulse working on it. On the other hand if a person is doing burglary for a specific reason impulse will definitely come into play which might stop him or her before committing the crime (Wellman, 2013). Impulsiveness means a different world view. It cannot be denied that people are born with positive and negative impulses and hence it is important to control the negative impulse effectively. Interdisciplinary study of impulsivity has related this aspect with antisocial conduct. Impulsivity is also a part of the working of psychopathic personality and has been associated with insane criminal mindset. Impulsivity from the point of view of psychology has been defined as the characteristics showed by a man who are largely denied social status or are considered inferior which then drive them to comm it a crime and hence mere punishments wouldnt rehabilitate their mindsets from committing another crime (Crockett, zdemir and Fehr, 2014). Comparing both the ideas taken up in this case it could be said that both the ideas are different from each other when one shows the applicability of punishment to rehabilitate a person on the other hand impulsivity shows the impulses that drive a person to commit a crime. It is important to assess both the perspectives effective to understand why deterrence doesnt work anymore. In the recent past there have been number of debates over the applicability of maximum sentence in rehabilitating a person or eliminating his thoughts about crime. On the other hand impulse is considered largely a reason for which a person commits crime (Garoupa and Rizzolli, 2012). People with impulsivity have been seen to have excessive propensity to commit crime and hence it is important for the criminal justice to have something better rather stronger to rehabilitate such actions or thoughts. Impulsivity is perhaps the most common trait associated with individual difference on offending. It is important t o note that most of the criminals committing a crime are focused on ultimately getting the benefits and hence doesnt consider the consequence and people who weigh up both these aspects make prudent decisions and this is where impulsivity comes into play (Friesen, 2012). A person who is considering a revenge on another person will definitely think about the possible ramifications he or she is likely to face after committing the crime. Hence these people cannot be influenced by the kind of sentence they get as may be he or she will do only one murder or may be when the person comes out of the jail will consider a career in crime which then he or she will do for money. There is a huge difference between deterrence by punishment with impulsivity. Maximum punishment of life incarceration or death sentence will not affect the mindset of the other criminals as now there are various ways of eluding criminal charges and hence impulsive criminals focus on committing crimes with a full proof p lan which would help him or her to elude charges (Kunst and Van Wilsem, 2013). In recent research it has been stated that impulsive felons focus on understanding the consequences and benefits and they often feel the consequences are deferred or uncertain which then helps them to commit a crime without any possible fear and it is tough to manage such criminals. The question that arises here is whether it is possible to deter these kinds of people from committing crimes further. The answer is considered a conundrum as it has been seen that even strictest punishments have not been able to reduce murders and molestations and hence it can clearly be stated that punishment is not anymore the best way to deter people from committing crimes. Impulsivity has come into the picture the importance of punishment has reduced to a large extent as people are not anymore afraid of punishments even death sentence. Even though it cannot be denied that long term jail do prevent crime but up to a point (Higgins et al., 2013). Logically analysing the impulsivity perspective of crime it could be said that it is very tough to manage impulsive criminals as they do not believe in humanity and are extremely selfish and want to achieve their own interest pretty easily. Hence some of the major questions which have been asked by the researchers that whether there is a clear impact of punishment on impulsive offenders the answer will clearly be no because it really doesnt make a huge difference on them and hence impulsivity will have to be dealt in different way (Carli et al., 2014). Punishing the offenders is basically the duty of all the states in Australia in fact in all the countries but it could be said that with time passing by there are number of ways people now can avoid punishment and even after punishment they are driven to commit crimes either for money or for taking revenge. A common point that could be used in this case to understand deterrence and punishment, is wearing helmet and getting fined for no t doing it. There are number of people all across the world who regularly ride motorcycles and dont wear helmets even after knowing if they get caught they could be fined or jailed for doing it repeatedly but still there are hardly people who follow rules which clearly shows that mere punishment is not anymore effective in deterring people from committing crimes especially impulsive criminals. There is another problem with punishment as often it is seen that the court or the justice system sometime accuse the innocent and acquit the guilty and naturally this makes the person an impulsive criminal who then sets in motion a series of events that completely changes the perspective of the innocent about the justice system and the society (Healey and Beauregard, 2017). Even though both the perspectives are definitely different but establish good viewpoints about making decisions regarding deterrence how it is influenced by punishment and impulsivity. Under any system especially in Australia men are taken care of in the best possible manner under punishment but then again the viewpoint of the society definitely doesnt change on him and he still is a criminal. The main difference among impulsive and non impulsive criminals is that impulsive criminals are more likely to focus on the benefits of the crime and non impulsive criminals will definitely weigh up the decisions effectively before committing a crime. The criminological research of impulsivity has focused primarily on the certainty and timing of the reward and cost of the offending behavior. Apparently it could be said that deterrence is tough in the contemporary world with punishment as long term punishment or death sentence ends up the career of a person and hence doesnt let the world know about the possible learning of the criminal and hence it doesnt end crime or criminals as courts become lenient but the planning of the crime becomes more interesting and smart that reduc es the chances of charges (Higgins et al., 2013). Deterrence is a complicated concept and there are number of aspects which come into play in this case. It is important to note that not always people will focus to make proper decisions before they commit crimes and feebleminded people will commit crime whimsically and then think about the consequences and hence mere punishment will not be able to restrain people from committing mistakes like this and hence this is where it becomes clear that why deterrence doesnt work anymore in the contemporary world and there should be specific strategies which should be developed to manage crimes and reduce crimes with swift, certain and severe decisions that will not let any further crime to happen (Nagin, 2013). Conclusion To conclude the essay it could be said that deterrence is difficult in the contemporary world as most of the criminals are focused on committing the crime and weighing up the benefits and consequences but at times they are very impulsive and hence impulsive people cannot be controlled through punishment. The two different perspectives of crime states that wither harsh punishments a story of a criminal is paused but it cannot completely make changes in the criminal environment as well as in the mindset of the criminals because impulsivity is largely related to criminality and hence it could be said that most of the criminals are impulsive and focused on doing the crime for maximum benefits and they dont think about punishment which ultimately doesnt lead to creation of awareness in the society and hence deterrence is not there. Overall to conclude it could be said that deterrence doesnt work anymore due to the increase in impulsive offenders and with the decrease in the impact of puni shments. References Braga, A.A. and Weisburd, D.L., 2012. The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,49(3), pp.323-358. Carli, V., Mandelli, L., Zaninotto, L., Alberti, S., Roy, A., Serretti, A. and Sarchiapone, M., 2014. Trait-aggressiveness and impulsivity: role of psychological resilience and childhood trauma in a sample of male prisoners.Nordic journal of psychiatry,68(1), pp.8-17. Crockett, M.J., zdemir, Y. and Fehr, E., 2014. The value of vengeance and the demand for deterrence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,143(6), p.2279. Cronin-Furman, K., 2013. Managing expectations: international criminal trials and the prospects for deterrence of mass atrocity.International Journal of Transitional Justice,7(3), pp.434-454. Friesen, L., 2012. Certainty of punishment versus severity of punishment: An experimental investigation.Southern Economic Journal,79(2), pp.399-421. Garoupa, N. and Rizzolli, M., 2012. Wrongful convictions do lower deterrence.Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE,168(2), pp.224-231. Healey, J. and Beauregard, E., 2017. Impulsivity as an etiological factor in sexual homicide.Journal of Criminal Justice,48, pp.30-36. Higgins, G.E., Kirchner, E.E., Ricketts, M.L. and Marcum, C.D., 2013. Impulsivity and offending from childhood to young adulthood in the United States: A developmental trajectory analysis.International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences,8(2), p.182. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P. and Tyler, T.R., 2012. Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions.British journal of criminology,52(6), pp.1051-1071. Kleck, G. and Barnes, J.C., 2013. Deterrence and Macro-Level Perceptions of Punishment Risks: Is There a Collective Wisdom?.Crime Delinquency,59(7), pp.1006-1035. Kunst, M. and Van Wilsem, J., 2013. Trait impulsivity and change in mental health problems after violent crime victimization: a prospective analysis of the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences database.Journal of interpersonal violence,28(8), pp.1642-1656. Nagin, D.S., 2013. Deterrence in the twenty-first century.Crime and Justice,42(1), pp.199-263. Saridakis, G. and Spengler, H., 2012. Crime, deterrence and unemployment in Greece: A panel data approach.The Social Science Journal,49(2), pp.167-174. Wellman, C.H., 2012. The rights forfeiture theory of punishment.Ethics,122(2), pp.371-393. Willison, R. and Warkentin, M., 2013. Beyond deterrence: An expanded view of employee computer abuse.MIS quarterly,37(1).